Ahmadinejad: Holocaust? What Holocaust?
So how is today’s speech playing in Peoria … er… Mecca ?? Here is an excerpt from Al-Jazeera which appears to have a fairly balanced accounting. There is no doubt however that the speech given at Columbia University today will be picked apart and used to further Ahmadinejad’s agenda both within Iran and in the Middle East in general. The platform provided his a level of legitimacy that he could not refuse. What’s next Columbia… an invitation to Hugo Chavez ???
Holocaust denial
Ahmadinejad rejected accusations that he has denied the Holocaust actually happened, but argued for more research to be conducted on the subject.
“I’m not saying that it didn’t happen at all,” he said. “I said, granted this happened, what does it have to do with the Palestinian people?”He used his 30-minute speech to repeat Tehran’s insistence that its nuclear programme was focused on meeting the country’s electricity needs.Washington says Iran is seeking to produce nuclear weapons.
“We do not believe in nuclear weapons. Period. This goes against the whole grain of humanity,” Ahmadinejad said.
During the question-and-answer session he denied that homosexuals were persecuted in Iran.
“In Iran we do don’t have homosexuals like in your country. In Iran we do not have this phenomenon. I do not know who has told you we have it,” he said, sparking laughter from the audience.
Some, however, were not amused:
“This is a sick joke,” said Scott Long of Human Rights Watch, saying Iran tortures gays under a penal code that punishes homosexuality between men with the death penalty.
US targets Iran force
Separately, Condoleezza Rice, the
US secretary of state, ratcheted up the pressure on Tehran, telling the Reuters news agency that the US was considering sanctions against the entire al-Quds force of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. Such a designation would enable Washington to target the force’s financing. The US accuses the Quds force of inciting violence in Iraq and of training and equipping fighters who have attacked US troops. Iran has repeatedly denied this. The US is increasing diplomatic pressure on Iran to stop uranium enrichment, which can produce nuclear weapons, and targeting the al-Quds force would be part of that strategy. “Remember that the problem with the Quds force is that it has a network of activities in support of terrorism but it also, we believe, has a network of activities in support of proliferation,” Rice said.— Excerpt from Al-Jazeera More….
The pressure can be turned up on Iran without military action. Regime change from within may still be possible but if we flat out attack the Iranian people whatever hope there would be for an internal regime change would be lost. There are voices that say that we would be welcomed with open arms… sorry… been there, done that. It’s doubtful that the Imams of Iran will ever allow a return to a more secular society within Iran.

| Sphere: Related Content |
You can follow any discussion by checking the notification box below the comment area or via our RSS 2.0 comment feed. -- ZZ N&S Staff
|
Link: http://zardozz.com/zz/2007/09/ahmadinejad-holocaust-what-holocaust.html |

Ahmadinejad rejected accusations that he has denied the Holocaust actually happened, but argued for more research to be conducted on the subject.
[Rate This Post]





















on Tuesday - Sep 25th, 2007 at 6:56 pm Angeline wrote:
I wrote about this too on my blog. Was watching on CNN the bemused expression on his faced when he was laughed at for making the homosexual comment…I really think he didn’t understand why he was laughed at.
on Tuesday - Sep 25th, 2007 at 7:02 pm zzb wrote:
This character doesn’t have a clue about the west any more than the west has a clue about life in Iran. We are all at the mercy of mass media….
on Wednesday - Sep 26th, 2007 at 4:26 pm Barry LeFarge wrote:
My hats off to the Columbia Univ. president. It takes balls ot bring the guy here to speak. But insulting him(as he should have) before the he spoke? Awesome!
on Monday - Oct 8th, 2007 at 6:07 am Peter Jaxon wrote:
How many hats do you need to wear Barry? Are they to hold your brains in? Last time I checked it doesn’t take any ‘balls’ to insult someone. Inviting the man was a good idea and were it not for his demonstrated ignorance I’d say almost courageous. It’s good to hear out those you disagree with, the bigger the disagreements the better. But to insult the man showed that an education can’t cure ignorance and crude grandstanding. If he had said something like “We at Columbia disagree strongly with what our not very reliable or truthful press tells us you have said, so we are glad to give you this chance to tell us personally what we can’t trust our so called information sources to give us. So go ahead, we are anxious to hear what you have to say”. Now that would qualify as having ‘balls’, considering that all we really knew about him was the pre packaged bullshit propaganda delivered by the govt. and it’s lapdog press. If he had introduced George Bush that way I might agree with you about his ‘balls’. Now go back to Rush and your fellow ditto heads. Awesome? Did you fall off your skateboard and hit your head or something?